PERAN LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN

Authors

  • Nadil Adila Bilqis Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang Author

Keywords:

digital literacy, learning quality, educational technology, teacher competency, curriculum integration

Abstract

This study investigates the role of digital literacy in improving the quality of learning in the context of Indonesian education, particularly in the era of Society 5.0 and accelerating educational digital transformation. The purpose of this research is to analyze the relationship between digital literacy competencies and learning quality outcomes, identify factors that influence the effective implementation of digital literacy in schools, and formulate strategic recommendations for strengthening digital literacy policies in the national education system. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study collected data through structured questionnaires administered to 320 teachers and students across secondary schools in Java and Bali, supplemented by in-depth interviews with 18 key informants including school principals, curriculum coordinators, and digital education practitioners. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Findings reveal that digital literacy significantly enhances student engagement, critical thinking, and self-directed learning capacity. However, persistent barriers—including inadequate infrastructure, insufficient teacher training, and socioeconomic disparities—continue to undermine equitable implementation. The study concludes that systemic integration of digital literacy into national curricula, combined with substantial investment in teacher professional development and digital infrastructure, constitutes a prerequisite for meaningful improvement in learning quality across all educational levels.

References

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120904313

Anggraeni, R., & Kusnandi, U. (2021). Literasi digital guru sekolah dasar di era new normal: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPD.051.05

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Telekomunikasi Indonesia 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/12/01/e97d31a44aa23f30929614d0/statistik-telekomunikasi-indonesia-2022.html

Baran, E., & Correia, A.-P. (2021). A professional development framework for online teaching. TechTrends, 58(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0735-7

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dabbagh, N., & Fake, H. (2017). College students' perceptions of personal learning environments through the lens of digital tools, processes and spaces. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.215

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Laporan tahunan program digitalisasi sekolah 2022–2023. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id

Kemkominfo. (2023). Laporan status literasi digital Indonesia 2023. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://literasidigital.id/publikasi

Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. ATD Press.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Mäkinen, M. (2020). Digital empowerment as a process for enhancing citizens' subjective wellbeing and quality of life. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 4(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960610837859

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Learning during — and from — disruption (Vol. I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pratiwi, N. (2021). Literasi digital generasi milenial dalam menghadapi berita hoaks di media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v13i2.10671

Pratiwi, D. I., & Santoso, B. (2021). Kompetensi TIK guru sekolah menengah atas dalam perspektif integrasi teknologi pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknodik, 25(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v25i1.697

Rahayu, S., & Firmansyah, A. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan transformasi digital pendidikan: Antara regulasi dan realitas lapangan. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 6(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/jkp.v6i1.47821

Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sari, Y. P., & Wijaya, H. (2022). Pengaruh integrasi teknologi digital terhadap keterlibatan siswa pada pembelajaran di SMA se-Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional, 4(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpn.v4i2.8841

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2021). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8

UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379381

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020915417

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2020). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

How to Cite

PERAN LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN. (2026). Qolamuna: Keislaman, Pendidikan, Literasi Dan Humaniora, 3(1), 223-232. https://jurnal.qolamuna.id/index.php/JQ/article/view/403

Similar Articles

51-60 of 85

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.